Which behavior would NOT be typical of a pygmalion-prone coach?

Which behavior would NOT be typical of a pygmalion-prone coach?

• A. Have flexible pre-season expectations
• B. Believe that success comes from having good athletes
• C. Hold stereotypic beliefs
• D. Believe people's traits are fixed

Answer: (A)

A pygmalion-prone coach is characterized by high expectations of their athletes and a belief in the ability to influence performance through these expectations. Such coaches typically hold the belief that individuals can grow and develop their skills through effort, practice, and support. Having flexible pre-season expectations implies that the coach is adaptable and willing to adjust their goals based on the athletes' development and progress, which aligns with the positive reinforcement approach a pygmalion-prone coach would embody. On the other hand, beliefs that success is solely dependent on having talented athletes, holding rigid or stereotypic beliefs about individuals, and viewing traits as fixed rather than dynamic, reflect a more static understanding of talent and growth. These mindsets can limit a coach’s effectiveness and the potential development of their athletes, which contrasts with the ideals of a pygmalion-prone coach who encourages growth and improvement.

A pygmalion-prone coach is characterized by high expectations of their athletes and a belief in the ability to influence performance through these expectations. Such coaches typically hold the belief that individuals can grow and develop their skills through effort, practice, and support. Having flexible pre-season expectations implies that the coach is adaptable and willing to adjust their goals based on the athletes' development and progress, which aligns with the positive reinforcement approach a pygmalion-prone coach would embody.

On the other hand, beliefs that success is solely dependent on having talented athletes, holding rigid or stereotypic beliefs about individuals, and viewing traits as fixed rather than dynamic, reflect a more static understanding of talent and growth. These mindsets can limit a coach’s effectiveness and the potential development of their athletes, which contrasts with the ideals of a pygmalion-prone coach who encourages growth and improvement.